Questa è una vecchia versione del documento!
Identification of heavy flavour jets with the CMS detector at 13 TeV
http://cms.cern.ch/cds/BTV-16-002
A. English/Style/Formatting (including figures)
B. Everything else (e.g. strategy, paper structure, emphasis, additions/subtractions, etc).
================================ Ksenia
Type A
o) L 281 “Only SVs with MSV6.5 GeV are considered.” Missing “>”.
o) Figure 13, left bottom x-axis label “P(dusg)” —> “P(udsg)”
o) Figure 20 caption “Efficiency for c jet identification versus the misidentification probability for light- flavour jets (left) or b jets for various c tagging algorithms applied to jets in tt events.” —> Efficiency for c jet identification versus the misidentification probability for b jets (left) or light- flavour jets (right) for various c tagging algorithms applied to jets in tt events.
o) Figure 25 It says pruned mass 50-200 GeV, while in text at L 806 it said to start at 70: “Jets are selected when they have a pruned mass between 70 and 200 GeV”.
o) L1586 “For convenience, the discriminator values are transformed from [− 1, 1 [ to [− 1, 1 [+ 2 ( N jets − 2 )” Misprinted brackets (also in Fig. 43 caption)
o) L1711 “pt” —> “p_{T}”
Type B
o) “These additional simulated events are then reweighted according to the observed number of pileup collisions or the observed PV multiplicity.”
How the “observed number of PU collisions” is defined? Maybe I just misread this sentence…
o) Figure 17, top left What causes the rapid decrease of b-jet tagging efficiency after pt~100? Maybe one could add a few words explaining the effect around L548?
================================ Nadia
Type A
Type B