Questa è una vecchia versione del documento!

http://cms.cern.ch/cds/B2G-12-015

Per ora solo nel link: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1603150

Stefano C.

TYPE B:

The paper is well written even though the analysis is quite complicated. Nevertheless the readability can be improved with a better description of the event samples and the channels involved in the analysis. - For instance, it is not always clear which event sample is targeting which final state of the TT decay. One way of making it more clear would be to add a table with all the samples considered, the summary of the cuts applied to target specific final states etc.

- Another point is the following: how is the Higgs decay treated? In lines 65-66 the authors say that the decay of the Higgs is incusive assuming SM BRs: this is a clear statement about the MC samples used, but there is no mention on the strategy for “tagging” the Higgs in the data samples. How is the sample enriched in T→tH is not really explained, while it is clear how you are tagging W (leptons+MET, W-jets) or b-quark (CSV).

TYPE A:

Abstract - “accumulated” → “collected”

- L 14-28: consider putting a figure with a Feynman diagram of the processes involved - L 20: what does “democratic” mean in this context?