Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

Link a questa pagina di confronto

Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente
Prossima revisione 		Revisione precedente
Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione
cms:b2g-12-015 [01/10/2013 11:10]
casasso 		cms:b2g-12-015 [01/10/2013 11:48]
casasso
Linea 12: Linea 12:
 The paper is well written even though the analysis is quite complicated. ​ The paper is well written even though the analysis is quite complicated. ​
 Nevertheless the readability can be improved with a better description of the event samples and the channels involved in the analysis. ​ Nevertheless the readability can be improved with a better description of the event samples and the channels involved in the analysis. ​
 +
  - For instance, it is not always clear which event sample is targeting which final state of the TT decay. One way of making it more clear would be to add a table with all the samples considered, the summary of the cuts applied to target specific final states etc.  - For instance, it is not always clear which event sample is targeting which final state of the TT decay. One way of making it more clear would be to add a table with all the samples considered, the summary of the cuts applied to target specific final states etc.
  
Linea 20: Linea 21:
  
 Abstract Abstract
 +
 - "​accumulated"​ -> "​collected"​ - "​accumulated"​ -> "​collected"​
 +
 +Main Body
  
 - L 14-28: consider putting a figure with a Feynman diagram of the processes involved ​ - L 14-28: consider putting a figure with a Feynman diagram of the processes involved ​
 +
 - L 20: what does "​democratic"​ mean in this context? - L 20: what does "​democratic"​ mean in this context?
 +
 +- L 107-108: not sure that the reader wants to know efficiency and purity of b-tagging algorithm with such a precision
 +
 +- L 110-112: it is not 100% clear the way you apply this additional jet-analysis and the interplay with the standard jet-recobstruction using the anti-kt algorithm. Please rephrase or add a statement to clarify
 +
 +- L 145-148: the procedure is not clear to me. Furthermore:​ "​initially"​ refers to what? If "​initially"​ then also "​finally"​ or "in a second step" should appear somewhere... Please rephrase this part
 +
 +Figure 1
 +
 +- consider using a different color for the pulls in the bottom, since it's exactly the same as the top background above
 +
 +- where does the uncertainty come from? Statistics + systematics on the normalization?​ Add a line in the caption ​
 +
 +- L 155-159: rephrase to avoid repetition
 +
 +Table 2
 +
 +- remove the arrow after lepton flavor
 +
 +- L 175: consider removing "​four",​ since in the following lines (until L 183) the reader can find only 3 categories
 +
 +- L 237-240: it would be good to have some more details on the shapes. Are they binnned shapes? How are they obtained? For example, I see in figure 2 that the signal sample seems to suffer from low statistics at low value of the BDT: how did you deal with this?
 +
 +- L 245-259: what about listing the systematics?​ this paraghraph can be re-organized and make it clearer
 +
 +Figure 6:
 +
 +- slightly bigger?
 +
 +Table 5:
 +
 +- is it really necessary to have this table? consider dropping it, since the figure 7 standalone is already very explicative
 +
 +- if it is essential, remove the "​Scenario"​ column, since it is useless and there is no other mention on "​scenarios"​ through the text