Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
| Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente | Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione | ||
|
cms:sus-13-012 [08/11/2013 11:09] ortona |
cms:sus-13-012 [08/11/2013 16:12] ortona |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linea 68: | Linea 68: | ||
| Abstract: "that are determined using data" -> determined using data-driven techniques | Abstract: "that are determined using data" -> determined using data-driven techniques | ||
| - | L2-10: I think this paragraph is a bit speculative and makes some quite bold statements. For example I don't think it's correct to state a well-established theory as the SM is incomplete because it does not explain features (dark matter) that are indeed a much less established theory (at least until someone finds a dark matter particle). Imo the only true incompleteness of the SM so far is its failure to include gravity. I think this paragraph covers aspects that are currently hotly debated issues in physics that are far beyond the scope of this paper, probably it would be better to remove it or to rephrase it in a much milder way. Also, I would change "seems to mark" -> "marks". The paper with the Higgs spin-parity properties is also coming out, I don't know if it will be before this paper, but if this is the case I would add it to the references | + | L2-10: I think this paragraph is a bit speculative and makes some quite bold statements. For example I don't think it's correct to state a well-established theory as the SM is incomplete because it does not explain features (dark matter) that are indeed a much less established theory (at least until someone finds a dark matter particle). Imo the only true incompleteness of the SM so far is its failure to include gravity. I think this paragraph covers aspects that are currently hotly debated issues in physics that are far beyond the scope of this paper, probably it would be better to remove it or to rephrase it in a much milder way. Also, I would change "seems to mark" -> "marks". The paper with the Higgs spin-parity properties is also coming out, I don't know if it will be before this paper, but if this is the case it can be a good idea to add it to the references |
| - | L76: signal regions have not been introduced before, I would change "The signal-enriched search regions are first" -> "Signal-enriched regions are" | + | L76: signal regions have not been introduced before, change "The signal-enriched search regions are first" -> "Signal-enriched regions are" |
| - | L284: \cancel{H}_T > 400 is not present in the table, did you mean 300 or 450? I would use 450 as 300-450 is a 1 sigma fluctuation and therefore "bins"->"bin" | + | L284: \cancel{H}_T > 400 is not present in the table, did you mean 300 or 450? If it is 450, as 300-450 is a 1 sigma fluctuation, change "bins"->"bin". |
| - | Fig5: I like this figure but it's really big, and it's not clear to me what informations it adds with respect to table 1. In the case you will need to save space I would consider to remove it | + | Fig5: I like this figure but it's really big, and it's not clear to me what informations it adds with respect to table 1. In the case you will need to save space you can consider to remove it |