Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
| Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente Prossima revisione | Revisione precedente Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione | ||
|
cms:sus-11-016 [03/10/2012 11:56] argiro |
cms:sus-11-016 [03/10/2012 12:21] migliore |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linea 8: | Linea 8: | ||
| Abstract: | Abstract: | ||
| 1. "up to 4.98 fb-1": we would suggest to write the actual range instead of "up to" (throughout the paper) | 1. "up to 4.98 fb-1": we would suggest to write the actual range instead of "up to" (throughout the paper) | ||
| + | |||
| 2. "range of mass parameters" : which mass ? | 2. "range of mass parameters" : which mass ? | ||
| L1-L6: the word "particle" is repeated 3 times in two lines | L1-L6: the word "particle" is repeated 3 times in two lines | ||
| + | |||
| L5: "one theoretical model ..." This is coming out of the blue, we should at least say (in one sentence) why this particular one is used in most CMS analyses. | L5: "one theoretical model ..." This is coming out of the blue, we should at least say (in one sentence) why this particular one is used in most CMS analyses. | ||
| + | |||
| L5 : "in most CMS analyses " -> In most of the analyses performed by the CMS collaboration (or similar rephrasing) | L5 : "in most CMS analyses " -> In most of the analyses performed by the CMS collaboration (or similar rephrasing) | ||
| - | L7 : principal -> principle (or at least, this seems to be the intended meaning) | + | L7 : principal -> principle (or at least, this seems to be the intended meaning) or remove the word and commas. |
| L7/9 : repetition of the word "particle" | L7/9 : repetition of the word "particle" | ||
| Linea 118: | Linea 121: | ||
| L.214: remove "The limits are thus subject to statistical fluctuations" (as everything...) | L.214: remove "The limits are thus subject to statistical fluctuations" (as everything...) | ||
| - | Fig.1 In the top header of each plot: Why m(~q)>>m(~g) and not the opposite? | + | Fig.1 caption "chargino" -> "neutralino" |
| - | caption "chargino" -> "neutralino" | + | |
| I have also two conceptual questions about these plots: | I have also two conceptual questions about these plots: | ||