Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

--- cms:sus-11-016 [03/10/2012 09:14]
migliore
+++ cms:sus-11-016 [03/10/2012 12:21]
migliore
@@ Linea 1: / Linea 1: @@
 http://cms.cern.ch/cds/SUS-11-016
+Stefano A.
+----------
+Type A:
+Abstract:
+. "up to 4.98 fb-1": we would suggest to write the actual range instead of "up to" (throughout the paper)
+. "range of mass parameters" : which mass ?
+L1-L6: the word "particle" is repeated 3 times in two lines
+L5: "one theoretical model ..." This is coming out of the blue, we should at least say (in one sentence) why this particular one is used in most CMS analyses.
+L5 : "in most CMS analyses " -> In most of the analyses performed by the CMS collaboration (or similar rephrasing)
+L7 : principal -> principle (or at least, this seems to be the intended meaning) or remove the word and commas.
+L7/9 : repetition of the word "particle"
+L13-14 : "For each SimplM, values of  Axepsilon can be calculated to translate a number of signal events into a cross section " . This needs rephrasing, e.g. "can be calculated to measure a cross section given the number of observed signal candidates". But it is not clear at this point if it _can_  be calculated or if actually did it.
+L15/16: We would suggest: "an upper limit on the xs times the br ($[\sigma \times BF]_{UL}$)", then remove ($[\sigma \times BF]$) at the end of the sentence. The definition in symbols without the UL is not used in the rest of the paper if we are not mistaken.
+L113 : "denoted the " -> denoted as the
 Nicolo`
@@ Linea 92: / Linea 121: @@
 L.214: remove "The limits are thus subject to statistical fluctuations"  (as everything...)
-Fig.1  In the top header of each plot: Why m(~q)>>m(~g) and not the opposite?
+Fig.1  caption "chargino" -> "neutralino"
-caption "chargino" -> "neutralino"
 I have also two conceptual questions about these plots:
-- Does LSP coincide with N_0^1 for all the points of the plots?
+) Does LSP coincide with N_0^1 for all the points of the plots?
-- The fine dashed lines diagonal seem to indicate a kinematic limit, e.g. m(LSP)<m(~g), which is probably wrong for the topology analyzed as for the cascade ~g->N_0^2->N_0^1 is m(LSP)<m(~g)-m(N_0^2)
+) The fine dashed lines diagonal seem to indicate a kinematic limit, e.g. m(LSP)<m(~g), which is probably wrong for the topology analyzed as for the cascade ~g->N_0^2->N_0^1 is m(LSP)<m(~g)-m(N_0^2)
 Also the fact that there is a constant offset between the dashed line and the edge of the "color" region is not intuitive as I would expect a constant offset for a constant value of m(N_0^2), specifically 200 GeV.
+Could you elaborate a bit on it?