Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
| Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente Prossima revisione | Revisione precedente Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione | ||
|
cms:exo-16-025 [04/11/2016 06:02] arcidiac |
cms:exo-16-025 [04/11/2016 07:08] arcidiac |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linea 46: | Linea 46: | ||
| Table 2 : In this form, the table is quite confusing. It is not clear if the "magnitude" column is the relative uncertainty on sigma x BR or on the quantity indicated by the last column. In the first case, I would remove the last column. For the label of the second column "Magnitude" is best described as "relative uncertainty" . In the caption: " the second column, the third column indicates " -> there is an offset in the column count, "Source" is the first column, therefore "Affected quantity" is the fourth, not the third, and "Effect on yield" is the third, not the second. | Table 2 : In this form, the table is quite confusing. It is not clear if the "magnitude" column is the relative uncertainty on sigma x BR or on the quantity indicated by the last column. In the first case, I would remove the last column. For the label of the second column "Magnitude" is best described as "relative uncertainty" . In the caption: " the second column, the third column indicates " -> there is an offset in the column count, "Source" is the first column, therefore "Affected quantity" is the fourth, not the third, and "Effect on yield" is the third, not the second. | ||
| - | ==== end Stefano ======= | ||
| - | Type B comments | + | |
| - | In the discussion of systematic uncertainties, it is not clear how b-tagging, the uncertainty on efficiency of which is up to 60%, can increase the sensitivity by 50%. Can you explain ? Table 2 is very important, but not very clear in understanding the origin and effect of the uncertainties. | + | |
| + | |||