Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

Link a questa pagina di confronto

Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente
Prossima revisione
Revisione precedente
Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione
cms:exo-16-025 [02/11/2016 14:57]
argiro
cms:exo-16-025 [04/11/2016 07:08]
arcidiac
Linea 1: Linea 1:
 http://​cms.cern.ch/​cds/​EXO-16-025 http://​cms.cern.ch/​cds/​EXO-16-025
  
 +
 +===== da Stefano ====
  
 Dear authors, ARC, congratulations on this well-written,​ clear paper. Below we have some questions/​comments to your attention. Dear authors, ARC, congratulations on this well-written,​ clear paper. Below we have some questions/​comments to your attention.
Linea 44: Linea 46:
 Table 2 : In this form, the table is quite confusing. It is not clear if the "​magnitude"​ column is the relative uncertainty on sigma x BR or on the quantity indicated by the last column. In the first case, I would remove the last column. For the label of the second column "​Magnitude"​ is best described as "​relative uncertainty"​ . In the caption: " the second column, the third column indicates " -> there is an offset in the column count, "​Source"​ is the first column, therefore "​Affected quantity"​ is the fourth, not the third, and "​Effect on yield" is the third, not the second. Table 2 : In this form, the table is quite confusing. It is not clear if the "​magnitude"​ column is the relative uncertainty on sigma x BR or on the quantity indicated by the last column. In the first case, I would remove the last column. For the label of the second column "​Magnitude"​ is best described as "​relative uncertainty"​ . In the caption: " the second column, the third column indicates " -> there is an offset in the column count, "​Source"​ is the first column, therefore "​Affected quantity"​ is the fourth, not the third, and "​Effect on yield" is the third, not the second.
  
 +
 +
 +
 +