Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
| Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente Prossima revisione | Revisione precedente Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione | ||
|
cms:exo-12-002 [31/08/2012 10:33] casasso |
cms:exo-12-002 [31/08/2012 13:24] casasso |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linea 4: | Linea 4: | ||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| Type B comments | Type B comments | ||
| + | |||
| + | - You quote the CDF limit on the stop mass (lines 48-51) which, btw, are LOWER not UPPER limits, (see Type A comments) as the best limits before this search, excluding M_t1 < 153 GeV. Your results seem to extend the limits at 453 GeV (240 GeV) for lambda_333 = 1 (any lambda_333), as you state in lines 178-180. Since your search is done in the 200-800 GeV it's not clear to me how you are able to exclude also the 153-200 GeV range. Could you explain me what I am missing? | ||
| - Too few figures and maybe even too small (especially the one with the limits!). I suggest to add somewhere (e.g. line 8,26) some Feynman diagrams, a few control distributions somewhere. | - Too few figures and maybe even too small (especially the one with the limits!). I suggest to add somewhere (e.g. line 8,26) some Feynman diagrams, a few control distributions somewhere. | ||
| Linea 40: | Linea 42: | ||
| - L 46: leptoquarks->leptoquark | - L 46: leptoquarks->leptoquark | ||
| + | |||
| + | - L 50: upper -> lower | ||
| - L 60: CMS detector-> the CMS detector | - L 60: CMS detector-> the CMS detector | ||
| Linea 45: | Linea 49: | ||
| - L 70-71: information->informations, is->are, final-state->stable | - L 70-71: information->informations, is->are, final-state->stable | ||
| - | - L 80: references should go after "algporithm" | + | - L 80: references should go after "algorithm" |
| - L 82-83: "corrected by correcting"?? | - L 82-83: "corrected by correcting"?? | ||
| Linea 51: | Linea 55: | ||
| - L 109-110: not well explained... Is the simulation corrected before computing the efficiencies or what? | - L 109-110: not well explained... Is the simulation corrected before computing the efficiencies or what? | ||
| - | BTW: | + | (BTW my draft here stops to count the lines for 13 lines...) |
| + | |||
| + | - After eq.1: you define here the missing Et but you should have done it some lines before when you first introduced it | ||
| + | |||
| + | - L 128: as are-> as | ||
| + | |||
| + | - L 130: could be -> is | ||
| + | |||
| + | - L 171: bquark -> b-quark | ||
| + | |||