Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

Link a questa pagina di confronto

Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente
Ultima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione
cms:exo-11-009 [27/06/2012 13:38]
argiro 		cms:exo-11-009 [27/06/2012 13:38]
argiro
Linea 173: Linea 173:
  
 o) l 6 : s-hat not defined o) l 6 : s-hat not defined
 +
 o) l 29: the sentence is broken: ".. and psedorapidity .. what ? (is defined as)" o) l 29: the sentence is broken: ".. and psedorapidity .. what ? (is defined as)"
 +
 o) l 30: "for this example " : which example ? this measurement ? o) l 30: "for this example " : which example ? this measurement ?
 +
 o) l 38: "is observable"​ -> "would be" o) l 38: "is observable"​ -> "would be"
-o) l 49: paragraph 1.2 is too short to stand on its own, consider incorporating the text in the introduction after line 25+ 
 +o) l 49: paragraph 1.2 is too short to stand on its own, consider incorporating the text in the introduction ​ 
 +after line 25 
 o) figure 2: as discussed, one figure is more than enough o) figure 2: as discussed, one figure is more than enough
 +
 o) Table I : a lot of techinical detail but no explanation in the text. Consider explaining how the MC sample was built in text and removing the table o) Table I : a lot of techinical detail but no explanation in the text. Consider explaining how the MC sample was built in text and removing the table
 +
 o) l 123-129 : confusing o) l 123-129 : confusing
 +
 o) fig 7 not clear if the result is used only to find the most sensitive value of Mlow. If this is the case, the figures can be removed, because they will confuse the reader. o) fig 7 not clear if the result is used only to find the most sensitive value of Mlow. If this is the case, the figures can be removed, because they will confuse the reader.