Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

--- cms:exo-10-026 [14/03/2011 09:43]
migliore link to draft2 added
+++ cms:exo-10-026 [15/03/2011 16:11] (versione attuale)
migliore
@@ Linea 11: / Linea 11: @@
 ) Quite often the explanations are so dense that they are difficult to follow.
@@ Linea 26: / Linea 25: @@
 l.48-49: (EM) why the threshold of the double-photon trigger is larger than that of the single-photon trigger?  If the single-photon is prescaled, you should mention it.
 l.53 (NC): The eta-cut value of 1.4442 is peculiar. What is our resolution in eta? DO we really know eta to the 4th decimal point?
-     (NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned?
+(NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned?
+l.60-73 (NC):  this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines?
-l.60-73 (NC):  this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines?
+(NP): ideally one would like to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions
-        (NP): ideally one would like to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic
-        energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions
 l.65-66: (EM) specify if the "rectangular strip" is centered around the direction of the photon candidate
@@ Linea 97: / Linea 97: @@
 NP: Nadia
+=== Answers to the comments to draft1 ===
+https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/EXO-10-026/37.html
+=== Draft 2 ===
 [[http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1335448|Entry on CERN Document Server for Draft 2]]