Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

--- cms:exo-10-026 [28/02/2011 16:38]
pastrone
+++ cms:exo-10-026 [15/03/2011 16:11] (versione attuale)
migliore
@@ Linea 11: / Linea 11: @@
 ) Quite often the explanations are so dense that they are difficult to follow.
@@ Linea 26: / Linea 25: @@
 l.48-49: (EM) why the threshold of the double-photon trigger is larger than that of the single-photon trigger?  If the single-photon is prescaled, you should mention it.
 l.53 (NC): The eta-cut value of 1.4442 is peculiar. What is our resolution in eta? DO we really know eta to the 4th decimal point?
-     (NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned?
-l.60-73 (NC):  this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines?
+(NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned?
-        (NP): ideally one would like to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic
-        energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions
+l.60-73 (NC):  this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines?
+(NP): ideally one would like to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions
 l.65-66: (EM) specify if the "rectangular strip" is centered around the direction of the photon candidate
@@ Linea 96: / Linea 96: @@
 NC: Nicolo
 NP: Nadia
+=== Answers to the comments to draft1 ===
+https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/EXO-10-026/37.html
+=== Draft 2 ===
+[[http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1335448|Entry on CERN Document Server for Draft 2]]