Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente Prossima revisione | Revisione precedente | ||
cms:exo-10-026 [28/02/2011 16:35] pastrone |
cms:exo-10-026 [15/03/2011 16:11] (versione attuale) migliore |
||
---|---|---|---|
Linea 11: | Linea 11: | ||
2) Quite often the explanations are so dense that they are difficult to follow. | 2) Quite often the explanations are so dense that they are difficult to follow. | ||
- | |||
Linea 26: | Linea 25: | ||
l.48-49: (EM) why the threshold of the double-photon trigger is larger than that of the single-photon trigger? If the single-photon is prescaled, you should mention it. | l.48-49: (EM) why the threshold of the double-photon trigger is larger than that of the single-photon trigger? If the single-photon is prescaled, you should mention it. | ||
- | l.53 (NC): The eta-cut value of 1.4442 is peculiar. What is our resolution in eta? DO we really know eta to the 4th decimal point? | + | l.53 (NC): The eta-cut value of 1.4442 is peculiar. What is our resolution in eta? DO we really know eta to the 4th decimal point? |
- | (NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned? | + | |
- | l.60-73 (NC): this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines? | + | (NP):Since this value is due to the exclusion of the 2 outermost ECAL barrel rings, has to be mentioned? |
- | (NP): ideally one would liek to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic | + | |
- | energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions | + | l.60-73 (NC): this list is hard to follow. Why not separate the points (i),(ii),(iii) using also new lines? |
+ | |||
+ | (NP): ideally one would like to read that isolation criteria are applied both to charghed tracks and to e.m. and hadronic energy depositions within defined DeltaR acceptances around the photon directions | ||
l.65-66: (EM) specify if the "rectangular strip" is centered around the direction of the photon candidate | l.65-66: (EM) specify if the "rectangular strip" is centered around the direction of the photon candidate | ||
Linea 51: | Linea 51: | ||
l.105: (EM) "orthogonal to each other" -> "independent" | l.105: (EM) "orthogonal to each other" -> "independent" | ||
+ | |||
+ | l.118: (NP) why the error on K factor is 0.3 here and 0.1 in l.96? | ||
l.125, 137, 173: (EM) GeV->GeV/c^2 | l.125, 137, 173: (EM) GeV->GeV/c^2 | ||
Linea 72: | Linea 74: | ||
Fig. 3 caption: n =>n_ED (to be consistent). | Fig. 3 caption: n =>n_ED (to be consistent). | ||
+ | |||
+ | l.152: panel | ||
l.154: (EM) 1/M_S^4 (n=2,95%)=0.078 TeV^-4 -> 1/M_S^4=0.078 TeV^-4 95% CL with n_ED=2 | l.154: (EM) 1/M_S^4 (n=2,95%)=0.078 TeV^-4 -> 1/M_S^4=0.078 TeV^-4 95% CL with n_ED=2 | ||
Linea 91: | Linea 95: | ||
EM: Ernesto | EM: Ernesto | ||
NC: Nicolo | NC: Nicolo | ||
+ | NP: Nadia | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Answers to the comments to draft1 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/EXO-10-026/37.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Draft 2 === | ||
+ | [[http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1335448|Entry on CERN Document Server for Draft 2]] |