Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

Link a questa pagina di confronto

Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente
Prossima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione
cms:cms-exo-12-025 [11/04/2014 17:03]
casasso
cms:cms-exo-12-025 [11/04/2014 18:04]
casasso
Linea 65: Linea 65:
  
 1) The introduction lacks of details about the models tested: the reader may want to have a bit deeper insight on the production 1) The introduction lacks of details about the models tested: the reader may want to have a bit deeper insight on the production
-mechanisms of this heavy guys, possibly introducing also the rho and pi TC hadrons+mechanisms of this heavy guy, possibly introducing also the rho and pi TC hadrons
  
 2) In general the paper is well written and clear apart from the chapter 4: it has several repetitions and the organization is sub-optimal,​ especially in the description of the objects (see also text comments). The section on the optimization of M(WZ) and LT cuts has too many details and will probably benefit from a plot with the interpolation of the cuts 2) In general the paper is well written and clear apart from the chapter 4: it has several repetitions and the organization is sub-optimal,​ especially in the description of the objects (see also text comments). The section on the optimization of M(WZ) and LT cuts has too many details and will probably benefit from a plot with the interpolation of the cuts
  
 3) The Lt variable, used for the optimization of the discrimination against background, does not seem (at least looking at fig. 1)  3) The Lt variable, used for the optimization of the discrimination against background, does not seem (at least looking at fig. 1) 
-to give much more information with respect to the M(WZ) cut. It is known the improvement in the sensitivity by adding the Lt cuts+to give much more information with respect to the M(WZ) cut. Is it known the improvement in the sensitivity by adding the Lt cuts
 compared to the M(WZ) cut alone? ​ compared to the M(WZ) cut alone? ​
  
Linea 89: Linea 89:
 L 123-124 & 127-128: consider merging these two sentences, since the information is the same L 123-124 & 127-128: consider merging these two sentences, since the information is the same
  
-L 129: You mean "close to unity"? ​Because if they were really compatible with unity within the uncertainty it would make no sense to apply them+L 129: You mean "close to unity"? ​If they were really compatible with unity within the uncertainty it would make no sense to apply them
  
 L 155: define Delta(pT) L 155: define Delta(pT)
Linea 95: Linea 95:
 L 144: "​overlapping"​ -> "​additional"​ L 144: "​overlapping"​ -> "​additional"​
    
-L 162-163: Clearly this is something that improve ​the signal efficiency, but what about the overall sensitivity?​ In principle also the background efficiency improves... ​+L 162-163: Clearly this is something that improves ​the signal efficiency, but what about the overall sensitivity?​ In principle also the background efficiency improves... ​
  
 L 163-164: consider merging this sentence with 127-128 L 163-164: consider merging this sentence with 127-128