Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisione Revisione precedente | Prossima revisione Entrambe le parti successive la revisione | ||
cms:cms-exo-12-025 [11/04/2014 17:03] casasso |
cms:cms-exo-12-025 [11/04/2014 18:04] casasso |
||
---|---|---|---|
Linea 65: | Linea 65: | ||
1) The introduction lacks of details about the models tested: the reader may want to have a bit deeper insight on the production | 1) The introduction lacks of details about the models tested: the reader may want to have a bit deeper insight on the production | ||
- | mechanisms of this heavy guys, possibly introducing also the rho and pi TC hadrons | + | mechanisms of this heavy guy, possibly introducing also the rho and pi TC hadrons |
2) In general the paper is well written and clear apart from the chapter 4: it has several repetitions and the organization is sub-optimal, especially in the description of the objects (see also text comments). The section on the optimization of M(WZ) and LT cuts has too many details and will probably benefit from a plot with the interpolation of the cuts | 2) In general the paper is well written and clear apart from the chapter 4: it has several repetitions and the organization is sub-optimal, especially in the description of the objects (see also text comments). The section on the optimization of M(WZ) and LT cuts has too many details and will probably benefit from a plot with the interpolation of the cuts | ||
3) The Lt variable, used for the optimization of the discrimination against background, does not seem (at least looking at fig. 1) | 3) The Lt variable, used for the optimization of the discrimination against background, does not seem (at least looking at fig. 1) | ||
- | to give much more information with respect to the M(WZ) cut. It is known the improvement in the sensitivity by adding the Lt cuts | + | to give much more information with respect to the M(WZ) cut. Is it known the improvement in the sensitivity by adding the Lt cuts |
compared to the M(WZ) cut alone? | compared to the M(WZ) cut alone? | ||
Linea 89: | Linea 89: | ||
L 123-124 & 127-128: consider merging these two sentences, since the information is the same | L 123-124 & 127-128: consider merging these two sentences, since the information is the same | ||
- | L 129: You mean "close to unity"? Because if they were really compatible with unity within the uncertainty it would make no sense to apply them | + | L 129: You mean "close to unity"? If they were really compatible with unity within the uncertainty it would make no sense to apply them |
L 155: define Delta(pT) | L 155: define Delta(pT) | ||
Linea 95: | Linea 95: | ||
L 144: "overlapping" -> "additional" | L 144: "overlapping" -> "additional" | ||
- | L 162-163: Clearly this is something that improve the signal efficiency, but what about the overall sensitivity? In principle also the background efficiency improves... | + | L 162-163: Clearly this is something that improves the signal efficiency, but what about the overall sensitivity? In principle also the background efficiency improves... |
L 163-164: consider merging this sentence with 127-128 | L 163-164: consider merging this sentence with 127-128 |